I recently wrote an article about the proposed extension of the Docklands Light Railway to Thamesmead. In that article, I expressed the opinion that I would not hold my breath as to whether the project would actually go ahead, due to problems with both planning, and more importantly funding. It would appear that I was incorrect, which I have to say in this instance pleases me greatly. In an announcement last week, the two main project sponsors, Transport for London and the Greater London Authority have said that the construction of new track and two new DLR stations at Beckton Riverside and Thamesmead Waterfront, including a new tunnel under the River Thames to link Beckton and Thamesmead would have substantial benefits for the area. According to research that they have undertaken, the scheme would cost approximately £1.5 billion. As I'm sure many people will be aware, this figure is in my opinion likely to go up substantially, as happened with the Elizabeth Line project. The DLR extension would bring additional benefits, including the construction of up to 30,000 new homes, in excess of 10,000 jobs and would also deliver £15.6 billion in economic growth to areas that are substantially deprived at present. The report also stated that a majority of the finance of the construction would come from loans taken out by the Greater London Authority and Transport for London, whilst it is said that the government would also contribute a substantial portion of the cash needed to build the extension. The report also stated that if the extension project got planning approval, construction of the extended line should begin in 2029 and open for travellers by 2033. Both Beckton and Thamesmead have much in common, they are both substantially brownfield sites, they suffer from high unemployment and very poor public transport. It had been hoped that the projects would also include an extension to Abbey Wood station to link up with the Elizabeth Line, but it would appear that this has now been dropped from the plans. The reason for this has been stated due to the large increase in costs and environmental concerns that this would cause. Nevertheless, if the project does get to the green light, it should be a major boost to the local area and provide a direct link into central London from Thamesmead. Currently residents have to travel by bus or car to Abbey Wood station, where they can pick up the Elizabeth Line or the overland train into central London. This can add a substantial amount of time to a commute, and also an increase in travel costs. One of the main reasons that Thamesmead has struggled with growth since its inception has been that the original designers of the town expected that nearly all of the residents would own cars and drive everywhere, so they did not give much thought to the use of public transport. In fact, the incidence of private car ownership within the town is substantially lower than the national average, making the improvements to public transport a high priority in order to encourage both economic and social growth. For more information about the proposed Docklands Light Railway extension, you can click here for their official website.
Opposite what historically was the Anchor Bay Farm - now the Frobisher Road housing estate on Manor Road, Erith, was (and still is) a terrace of cottages which date back to 1861. Behind these and the on the banks of the River Thames is a parcel of land on which nowadays you can find the Abbey Car Breakers, City Batteries (formerly Vinton Metals) and EMR - European Metal Recycling. All three organisations use land that used to be occupied by an absolutely massive factory operated by The British Fibrocement Works. The factory - which was the largest of its type in the UK, manufactured cement items which were reinforced and made fireproof by the addition of Asbestos fibres. This company manufactured Asbestos cement sheets under the "Fibrent" name, used for walls and ceilings, and produced slates for roofing. The company expanded its operation beyond the original site, which previously had been an iron works, to incorporate land to the south, this of which was formerly occupied by Anchor Bay Farm and a large brick works. You can see an aerial view of the factory from February 1939 above - click on the image to see a larger version. You can see a number of other aerial photos of the factory and surrounding area by clicking here. Nowadays the production of Asbestos containing products is banned by international law, due to the highly toxic nature of the material. Much of the Asbestos used in the British Fibrocement Works was originally mined in Ukraine. Parts of the factory buildings still exist today.
Over the past couple of weeks, Bexley Council has been getting their domestic waste collection contractor to fix a sticker onto the lid of every households non-recyclable waste bin. The sticker, which is quite often haphazardly and carelessly stuck onto the bin in a wonky and very slapdash manner, is designed to remind householders that food waste is to be stored in the separate food waste caddy and not in the non-recyclable bin prior to collection. I've had some considerable feedback from local residents regarding this enterprise, and much of it has not been encouraging. The general consensus is that the stickers are patronising, condescending and unnecessary, and the waste collection contractors take little if any care of how they fix the reminder stickers to the green bin. Some have been so annoyed with this undertaking that they have removed the unsightly stickers from their bins. Personally, I do wonder how much the design, production and deployment of these stickers has cost Bexley Council, and whether they will actually recoup the cost in the form of recycling savings. I fully appreciate the sentiment behind the reminders, but I feel that Bexley Council have taken a somewhat high-handed and prescriptive approach. It seems to be all stick and no carrot. It is also treating local residents as if they are irresponsible concerning their use of the recycling bins, which in many cases I feel is not an accurate reflection of the situation. It has also annoyed a substantial number of people, which seems to be counterproductive. I know that Malcolm of the excellent Bexley is Bonkers Blog has taken exception with local waste collection services in the past. I have to say in this instance I have to add my own voice to his. I get the feeling that somebody in the waste management department of Bexley Council had the idea without doing sufficient research, and taking due consideration of the possible negative effects. It seems to be another case of the law of unintended consequences.





No comments:
Post a Comment